THE MATILDA EFFECT FROM PAST TO PRESENT: THE HISTORICAL JOURNEY OF INVISIBILITY IN SCIENCE

Authors

Abstract

This study examines the Matilda Effect, which arises from the frequent overlooking of women scientists’ contributions or attributing them to their male colleagues, in light of its historical roots, reflections in contemporary academic structures, and examples in the history of science. The Matilda Effect not only highlights individual recognition deficiencies but also makes visible the structural gender-based inequalities embedded in the production and dissemination of knowledge. The main findings of the research show that the invisibility of women in science throughout history stems not only from cultural or individual biases but also from the male-dominated nature of scientific institutions and traditions. Systematic barriers, such as the “glass ceiling,” exist in front of women scientists’ advancement in academia; these obstacles limit the quality and diversity of scientific production. Furthermore, women researchers being less visible in publications, receiving fewer citations, facing disadvantages in access to funding, and being underrepresented in reward processes are considered contemporary reflections of this effect. The results of the study reveal that the Matilda Effect continues in various forms today, and therefore, scientific recognition mechanisms need to be made more equitable. The insufficient visibility of women scientists’ achievements harms not only individual careers but also the holistic development of science. In this context, scientific communities need to be restructured in accordance with the principles of diversity, inclusivity, and gender equality.

References

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.

Akal, C. B. (2005). İktidarın Üç Yüzü. Ankara: Dost Yayınevi.

Akbulut, U. (2016). Caroline Herschel: Bilimsel Makale Yazan İlk Kadın Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025 https://www.uralakbulut.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/CAROLINE-HERSCHEL-B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MSEL-MAKALE-YAZAN-%C4%B0LK-KADIN-13-ARALIK-2016.pdf

Anderson, E. (1999). Feminist perspectives on the self. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2019 ed.). Stanford University.

Anderson, E. (2000). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2019 ed.). Stanford University.

Aristotle. (1944). Generation of animals (A. L. Peck, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.)

Balcı, Y., Aksu, A. ve Okuyaz, S. (2024). Marie Curie’den Günümüze Radyolojide Kadınlar: Türkiye Örneği. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 14(2), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1465195)

Caplar, N., Tacchella, S., & Birrer, S. (2017). Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nature Astronomy, 1(6), 0141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0141

Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141.

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford University Press.

Çakır, Ö. (2008). Türkiye’de Kadının Çalışma Yaşamından Dışlanması. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (31), 25-47.

Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327.

Dökmen, Z. Y. (2022). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar (12. Baskı). Remzi Kitabevi.

European Commission. (2024). She Figures 2024: Gender in Research and Innovation. Publications Office of the European Union. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2025 https://eraportal.sk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/She-Figures-2024-Summary_UNDER-

Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15(5), 654–666.

Gage, M. J. (1870). Woman as Inventor. The North American Review, 111(229), 478–489.

Gupta, M., Madabushi, J. S., & Gupta, N. (2023). Critical overview of patriarchy, its interferences with psychological development, and risks for mental health. Cureus, 15(6), e40216. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40216

Işıklı, Ş. (2005). Kadın ve Felsefe. İstanbul: Emre Yayınları.

Halbert, D. (2006). Feminist interpretations of intellectual property. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 14(2), 287-314.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLOS Biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956

Jagsi, R., Motomura, A. R., Griffith, K. A., Rangarajan, S., & Ubel, P. A. (2015). Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(11), 804–811.

Kandiyoti, D. (1987). Emancipated but Unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish case. Feminist Studies, 13(2), 317-338. http://doi.org/10.2307/3177804

Kaya, E. E. (2022). Bilim Genç. TÜBİTAK. Erişim Tarihi: 25.09.2025 https://bilimgenc.tubitak.gov.tr

Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Kifinfo. (2025). New She Figures statistics: EU sharpening its focus on diversity in research. Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2025 https://kifinfo.no/en/2025/06/new-she-figures-statistics-eu-sharpening-its-focus-diversity-research/

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda Effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication, 35(5), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684

Lerchenmueller, M. J., & Sorenson, O. (2018). The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences. Research Policy, 47(6), 1007–1017.

Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Koster, J. B., & Leboy, P. S. (2012). The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435830

Lindberg, D. C. (2007). The beginnings of Western science: The European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450 (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ma, Y., Oliveira, D. F. M., Woodruff, T. K., & Uzzi, B. (2019). Women who win prizes get less money and prestige. Nature, 565(7739), 287–288.

Maddox, B. (2003). Rosalind Franklin: DNA’nın karanlık kadını (Çev. A. Ersavcı). TÜBİTAK Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 2002 yılında yayımlanmıştır.)

Maharaj, Z. (1995). A social theory of gender: Connell’s gender and power. Feminist Review, (50), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1995.3

Marie Curie – Biographical. (2025). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach.Erişim Tarihi: 26.09.2025 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1903/marie-curie/biographical

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109

Nature Editorial. (2025). Gender patterns in high-impact scientific publishing. Nature. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2025 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00553-x

Ogilvie, M. B. (2008). Women in Science: Antiquity through the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Romeo, J. (2021). Erasing women from science? There's a name for that. JSTOR Daily.Erişim Tarihi: 26.09.2025 https://daily.jstor.org/erasing-women-from-science-theres-a-name-for that

Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew/Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004

Schiebinger, L. (1989). The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science? Harvard University Press.

Schiebinger, L. (2008). Women in science: Historical perspectives. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 2016–2022). Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.

Schiebinger, L. (2008). Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering. Stanford University Press.

Shaw, W. M. K. (2004). Osmanlı Müzeciliği Müzeler, Arkeoloji ve Tarihin Görselleştirilmesi. Esin Soğancılar (Çev.), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları

Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., García-Costa, D., Farjam, M., & Mehmani, B. (2021). Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 737–745.

Stat News. (2024). Nobel Prizes reveal ongoing gender bias in scientific recognition. Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2025 https://www.statnews.com/2024/10/11/nobel-prizes-2024-gender-bias-science/

Sugimoto, C. R., Lariviére, V., Ni, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature 504(7479), 211-213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

Teich, E. G., Kim, J. Z., Lynn, C. W., Simon, S. C., Klishin, A. A., Szymula, K. P., Srivastava, P., Bassett, L. C., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., & Bassett, D. S. (2021). Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09047. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09047

UNESCO. (2021). Science report: The race against time for smarter development. Paris: UNESCO.

Published

29-12-2025

How to Cite

CÜCEMEN, T. (2025). THE MATILDA EFFECT FROM PAST TO PRESENT: THE HISTORICAL JOURNEY OF INVISIBILITY IN SCIENCE. Journal of Management and Organization History, 4(1), 15–29. Retrieved from https://managementhistory.org/index.php/jmoh/article/view/30